by Gabrielle DeSantis

As some may have seen earlier in the week, Red Bull had two drifters in Kyiv, Ukraine, to shoot a drifting film. City officials denied Red Bull’s license request to shoot at a UN World Heritage site. Seeing as how the energy drink people were already there with a drifty Nissan Z car and what looks like a BMW in tow, a little bureaucracy wasn’t going to stop them from raising a little bit of hell. Well, Ukraine has decided to answer back by impounding the Red Bull drift cars. 

The Red Bull Drift Brothers | Clive Rose/Getty Images

Red Bull was struck down for drifting without permission

Now, in the grand scheme of things, this may not feel like a big deal, but it was a huge deal to the Ukrainian government. This dismissal of the permit refusal caused the exact outcome that led to the refusal in the first place. 

The Drive reports that Red Bull sent out two of its drivers, Conor Shanahan and Aleksandr Grinchuk, to Sofievskaya Square to film a commercial with Ukrainian rapper Alyona Alyona. However, Kyiv’s City Council denied the request citing the risk of damage to the historic yellow brick outside the Saint Sophia Cathedral by the Red Bull drift cars. 

The smokey PR stunt caused quite the fuss, indeed. The aftermath of the tire squealing event left the site marred with over 2,000 square meters of black tire marks across the ornamental brick pavement. 

Red Bull quickly apologized for the stunt but the cars still got snatched

On the same day that the stunt occurred, Red Bull told The Drive that they apologized to the government and the people of Kyiv for the reckless stunt. One of the two drivers, Aleksandr Grinchuk, also made a point to apologize by throwing the company under the bus a little. 

“I have a contract stipulating that I must take part in projects, one of which was a pair drift in the center of Kyiv with a guest colleague in the Red Bull shop from Ireland, European vice-champion Conor Shanahan,” said Grinchuk, according to a translated article from a Ukrainian news source. “The aim of the project is to promote the brand and shoot a beautiful video for the Days of the Flag and Independence of Ukraine.”

Kyiv officials estimate the cost to repair the 2,000 square meters (21,500 square feet) of damaged historic brick to run $1,766.26 (47,092.14 Ukrainian Hryvnia). Also, the energy drink company was fined $63.76 for disobeying the denied stunt drifting permit. On top of that, Grinchuk and Shanahan’s cars were impounded as evidence on the day of the event, though reports still aren’t clear if the vehicles have been returned or if they are still being held at this time. 

Was the stunt worth it? 

Red Bull has a long history of pulling wild stunts. In fact, it has done so many things like this that it’s easy to forget that Red Bull’s original product is just an energy drink. What was once just badass stunts to promote the energy drink has now morphed into many major, top-tier motorsports teams.

Various Red Bull drivers have ramped a myriad of major world monuments, set world record stunts, and have even become major players in the pinnacle of motorsport, Formula 1. This isn’t the company’s last over-the-top stunt. This is what they do. It’s good that Red Bull has apologized. Pulling rad stunts is inarguably entertaining, but damaging historic sites is an unnecessary outcome.

RELATED: Unauthorized Red Bull Drifting Stunt Damages a UNESCO World Heritage Site

The post Red Bull Drift Cars Confiscated by Ukrainian Government For Raising Hell Without a Permit appeared first on MotorBiscuit.

by Gabrielle DeSantis

Following on the NHTSA’s announcement that they’re investigating Tesla’s recent spate of accidents involving emergency vehicles, two U.S. senators are asking the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to look into Tesla. Their primary concern? Tesla’s marketing of the Autopilot feature. Senators Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) are imploring the FTC to consider whether Tesla is misleading the public into believing that Autopilot is more capable of autonomous operation than it really is. 

2021 Tesla Model 3 | Tesla

What do the senators want Tesla investigated?

A red 2021 Tesla Model S driving with mountains in the background.
2021 Tesla Model S | Tesla

Both Markey and Blumenthal are concerned that Tesla is marketing their Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features as being more autonomous than they really are. Tesla does include disclaimers that Tesla Autopilot and Full Self-Driving are meant to be used with a driver overseeing their operation. Yet this hasn’t stopped people from misusing it. People keep dying in Teslas with Autopilot and FSD engaged. This raises the question of who’s responsible?

Markey and Blumenthal expressed the belief that Tesla is to blame in a letter to Lina Khan, chair of the FTC. They write, “Tesla’s marketing has repeatedly overstated the capabilities of its vehicles, and these statements increasingly pose a threat to motorists and other users of the road.” 

The senators believe Tesla’s marketing is deceptive

The letter to Khan also goes on to say that Tesla’s marketing is deceptive. It makes people believe that these features are capable of self-driving. The senators point out that “there are no fully autonomous vehicles currently available on the market.”

Yes, Tesla’s disclaimers that a person must be in control of their Tesla at all times. The two senators say that Tesla’s actual marketing campaigns go against this. They point to a YouTube video which shows a Tesla operating alone with Full Self-Driving engaged. Markey and Blumenthal point out that the disclaimers about safely using these features aren’t even readily available for people to see. “While Tesla has buried qualifying disclaimers elsewhere on their website, the link in the video’s caption redirects to a purchasing page that fails to provide additional information about the true capabilities of the vehicle.”

Markey and Blumenthal want Tesla to be more transparent about what Autopilot and FSD can and cannot do. “Understanding these limitations is essential, for when drivers’ expectations exceed their vehicle’s capabilities, serious and fatal accidents can and do result.” 

People continue to misuse Autopilot and Full Self-Driving

Despite both Tesla’s warnings and stories of fatal accidents involving Autopilot and FSD, people continue to misuse both semi-autonomous features. Both driving systems amount to little more than an advanced cruise control. Still, people believe that a Tesla can safely drive itself. This is not the case, as the number of fatal accidents rising proves. 

In addition to fatal accidents, people keep doing dangerous things with Telsa Autopilot and Full Self-Driving engaged. A man was arrested for sleeping while his Tesla hurtled along at 80 mph. Recently, an intoxicated Tesla driver was found passed out while their car drove. The Tesla pulled over once it realized there wasn’t a coherent driver in control. However, these safeguards aren’t difficult to fool, and plenty of people have done just that. 

Additionally, Teslas have been crashing into emergency vehicles – which often have their lights engaged and signals on. Now the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is investigating. Evidently Markey and Blumenthal aren’t the only ones concerned with Teslas semi-autonomous features. 

The technological advancements of Autopilot and Full Self-Driving are exciting and could lead to more lives being saved. Yet this is only true if they’re used safely and within the parameters of their capabilities. As Markey and Blumenthal point out, too many Tesla drivers either aren’t aware of what these are, or are choosing to ignore them. And while people are misusing Autopilot and FSD – intentionally or not – the lives of not just Tesla drivers, but everyone on the road, are at risk.

RELATED: A Massive Supercomputer Controls Tesla’s Autopilot

The post Two Senators Want Tesla Investigated appeared first on MotorBiscuit.

by Gabrielle DeSantis

Opting to lease a vehicle instead of buying it is a much cheaper choice for those who qualify. Instead of paying for the whole car, you’ll be leasing it, or making payments based on the car’s value for a specified amount of time, usually three years.

According to Springfield News-Sun, more drivers are choosing to give leasing a try. Those who lease or are considering leasing have a few questions about the process, especially about what happens when the lease is about to be done. Let’s see what you need to know before your lease ends. 

What do potential lessees want to know?

Leasing | Getty Images

One of the most popular questions people ask is where they should return the vehicle when the lease is up. You might be surprised to hear that you can actually return it to any dealer that’s authorized for that particular brand. For example, if you leased a Ford, you need to go to a dealer that deals with Ford vehicles. However, you might want to return it to the dealer that leased the car to you if you choose to buy it. 

The other question dealers often get concerning car leases is whether there will be more fees when you turn the vehicle back in. This depends on the lease agreement that you signed. Often, people will pay a turn-in fee, but that could be waived, in some cases, if you lease another vehicle from the same manufacturer. 

The biggest fees come from the inspection the dealer performs when you bring back the vehicle. If there’s more wear and tear, or extra mileage that exceeds what’s allowed in the lease agreement, you’ll pay extra to compensate for it. It’s best to keep the vehicle in good shape and avoid using it for trips that eat a lot of miles. There could also be a fee if you turn in the leased vehicle earlier than the expiration of the lease. 

What are your options when a car lease is about to expire?

If you leased a vehicle and the agreement is about to expire, there are a few options you can take for the next step. The first one is obvious: turning it in, paying any fees necessary, and walking away from the deal. Many people choose to do this if they don’t like the car they leased or want something different. 

You can also extend the lease agreement if you like the car but aren’t ready to buy it. If you want something different, you can find another car to lease. You don’t have to use the same dealer, especially if you want to try another brand. 

One little-known option is to try to transfer your lease to someone else before your agreement expires. According to Money Crashers, it’s not often used, but it’s an idea that appears to be gaining attention. You won’t need to pay any extra money if you can get someone to take it over before your contract expires. The last option will be to purchase the vehicle if you really love it and want to keep it. 

Finding the value of the car if you choose to purchase it afterwards?

If you choose to buy the vehicle once your agreement is up, you will need to know its residual value. In your agreement, there should be a price that the dealer sets that lets you know how much you can purchase the car for at the end of the agreement period. The next thing you need to determine is what the true value is for the car, according to CarPro USA

It’s not recommended to check online value checkers, like NADA or Kelley Blue Book. While they can give you an idea of what your vehicle might be worth, it’s not going to help for true value. This is the price that someone is willing to pay for it, which could be higher or lower than those online checkers tell you. Instead, consult a used car manager to see what they would be willing to buy it for. Once you know what they’re willing to pay and what the residual value is, you can determine if buying it is worth it for you. 

If the true value and residual value are close to the same price, you’re good to go. You can buy it if you choose without worrying about overpaying. However, if the residual price is much higher than the true value is, you will need to decide if it’s worth paying extra to have it. 

Leasing is a good way of trying out a vehicle that you’re just not sure if you want to commit to purchasing. You can make payments for a few years, and once the agreement expires, you have the choice of buying it, trading it in, or just handing it back and leaving the dealer without the extra hassle buying a car sometimes brings. 

RELATED: What ‘Inception Fees’ Do You Need to Pay When Leasing a Car?

The post Your Car Lease Expires Soon — What Should You Do? appeared first on MotorBiscuit.

by Gabrielle DeSantis

The Chevy Corvette is known for its sporty looks, fast performance, and ability to last a long time, passing the 500,000-mile mark for some of its models. While it’s not a car for everybody, it still has quite a bit of a following. 

With all the available versions on the new and used markets, which ones should an enthusiast get? According to the New York Daily News, there are tons, but the list has been narrowed to some of the most iconic in the car’s history.

How it all began

Class Chevrolet Corvette Logo | Getty Images

The first model to hit the market was the 1953 version, which wasn’t really all that exciting. This model looked OK for a sports car, but it wasn’t much of a performer. Powering it up was a 235-cubic inch Inline-six motor that produced only 150 hp. While it was far off from the models we see today, it was still a good starting point for the design elements and performance that would come later. 

1955 Chevy Corvette V8

The first model that set the pace for performance was the 1955 version. The six-cylinder left, and the V8 stepped into its place. Chevy wouldn’t waver from the engine, but it would tweak it over the years. The 265-cubic inch motor, paired with the three-speed manual transmission, enabled it to get 8.5 seconds for a 0 to 60 mph run, which is a definite improvement from the previous engine that got 11 seconds. 

1963 Corvette Stingray Split Window Coupe

While the 1955 model brought the performance, the 1963 version brought style. This Corvette sported a split rear window, which appealed to many Corvette fans. However, it only lasted a year because of some issues drivers had with visibility from those windows. Under the hood was a 327-cubic inch V8 motor that generated 360 hp when you ordered the optional fuel injection. The new independent rear suspension was a nice bonus as well. 

1987 Chevy Corvette

This model is considered a classic with its futuristic style inspired by the exterior of the 1984 version, which looked like it came from a Star Trek movie set at the time. You could choose a coupe model, or you could go for the convertible one. According to Corvette Museum, Chevy gave it plenty of power that year with the 5.7-liter V8 engine, which puts out 240 peak hp and 345 lb-ft of torque. 

2009 Corvette ZR-1

The first ZR-1 showed up in the 1980s, but it returned for the 2009 model. Powering this one up was a 6.2-liter V8 that could produce 638 hp. It was known as one of the fastest vehicles of that time period. This model clocked a 3.5-second acceleration time for a 0 to 60 run and an 11.5-second time for the quarter-mile. 

2016  Chevy Corvette Stingray Z51

Chevy proved that not only was the Corvette a sweet-looking vehicle with a ton of performance, but it could also be fuel-efficient as well with this model. Dan Cummins Auto Group said the 6.2-liter V8 could deliver 30 mpg on the highway, which isn’t often seen with fast cars like this.

This version came with driver’s seat memory, Bluetooth, a touchscreen for its infotainment center, and a heads-up display. You could also get several driving modes and magnetic ride control. 

Many people think of the Corvette as legendary, and it’s held up quite well over the 60+ years it’s been around. If you’re in the market for a used Corvette, there are plenty of models to choose from besides the five listed here. 

RELATED: Extreme Vetting: The World’s 10 Quickest Corvettes

The post What Is the Best Year of Corvette to Buy? appeared first on MotorBiscuit.