by Gabrielle DeSantis

Will rising gas prices in America be the final straw for gas-powered vehicle lovers? It’s no secret that there are many advantages to owning an electric vehicle. EVs are cheaper to own than gas-powered vehicles when it comes to refueling. They may soon be cheaper to purchase, thanks to federal tax credits and local incentives. Gas prices are pushing drivers out of gas-powered vehicles and into new EVs.

Kiss high gas prices goodbye with EVs

Shell gas station | Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

For decades Americans have found common ground complaining over gas prices. Gas prices are one topic that we can all agree on in these divisive times. Folks will frequent certain gas stations that are further away just to save a few cents per gallon. Why? Because those cents add up to major dollars at the pump annually.

Electric vehicle charging eliminates gas pricing issues. The fueling process may be much slower at times, but ultimately EVs save money, and gas-powered vehicles burn it. Owning a big pickup truck with poor fuel economy often feels like throwing your paycheck into a paper shredder when at the pump.

Gas prices in America don’t seem to be falling anytime soon. Thanks to the economic crisis created by the pandemic, America is primed for inflation. Everything from a gallon of milk to a gallon of gas can and will increase in price. According to Road Show by CNET, more Americans are choosing EVs over gas vehicles than ever before.

Electric vehicle ownership offers a life raft that can be deployed from this sinking economic ship. The stigma about EVs being boring and impractical is now dead, thanks to models like the Ford Mustang Mach-E. Frankly, there has never been a better time to purchase a new EV because of low prices and tax incentives. If saving the world wasn’t enough of a sales pitch for you, maybe saving yourself from burning cash at the pump will make you a believer.

Why are gas prices so high now?

Gas prices are displayed at a pump
Prices are up across the nation | Ben Hasty via Getty Images

In 2020 gas prices in America dropped to historic lows because of the coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic. Today they have reached record highs because of the Colonial Pipeline cyber attack, surging demand, and inflation. The cyber attack may have been months ago, but the country saw how vulnerable our gas supplies were. The imagery of $7 gallons won’t leave the minds of consumers anytime soon.

The pandemic created an economic rollercoaster, and while we may have averted a jobs crisis for the time being, the cost of goods has increased. Emission, drilling, and production restrictions have also made gas more of a rarity in states like California, driving the prices further up. The conditions for gas prices in America to stay at a steady incline are set perfectly.

Where are gas prices highest in the U.S.?

States like Utah, Oregon, Nevada, and Washington have high gas prices, all coming in at 40 cents above average per gallon in America. California has the nastiest gas prices averaging over $4.00 recently. As emission restrictions become more common and gas prices in America rise, the idea of EV ownership will only become more appealing. Will you be making the switch to electric?

RELATED: The Country With the Most Expensive Gas Prices Is Not the U.S.

The post Rising Gas Prices Are Forcing More Americans into New EVs appeared first on MotorBiscuit.

by Gabrielle DeSantis

Every auto magazine has said it a thousand times before, but we’ll say it again: there’s no such thing as a 100% self diving car (yet), just cars with self driving features. But Ford recently jumped into the hands-free driving arena, taking on the Chevy SuperCruise with its own BlueCruise software. Both systems aim to give the driver a hands-off experience and have been classified as Level 2 autonomous driving by SAE standards. But don’t be fooled, you’ll still be “driving” the car, even if your hands aren’t on the wheel.

BlueCruise Hands Free Driving | Ford

SuperCruise and BlueCruise are very similar hands-free driving technologies

Both SuperCruise and BlueCruise use what’s called adaptive cruise control. Like your typical cruise control, it maintains the car’s speed, but unlike cruise control, it can also “adapt” to the traffic around you. When a car in front of you steps on its brakes, the adaptive cruise control will kick in and slow you down while maintaining a good following distance. All without any input from the driver.

The “hands-free” part comes from the lane keep assist systems. The car tracks the lines and automatically stays centered in your lane. Granted, this lane-assist only works on certain divided highways. Chevy and Ford both have over 200,000 miles of road mapped out in the US. But just because the driver isn’t steering doesn’t mean they can slack off.

Onboard both BlueCruise and SuperCruise capable vehicles are cameras capable of tracking the driver’s eyes. Sounds a bit dystopian, always being watched while you’re driving, but that’s not the point. It makes sure that the driver stays focused on the road, keeping their eyes forward and away from their phone. And the system can even see through sunglasses.

Tesla’s Autopilot doesn’t have any cameras watching, which is why you hear so many stories about drivers taking naps while in motion. Ford and Chevy’s hands-free systems, however, won’t be as easy to rig (not that you should attempt to).

SuperCruise is already available in selects Cadillacs

Cadillac CT6 Reveal With Chevy SuperCruise Tech
Cadillac CT6 | Steve Fecht via Cadillac

While Ford aims to sell 100,000 vehicles equipped with BlueCruise, such as the Mustang Mach-E and the Ford F-150, GM has been using the Chevy SuperCruise tech since 2018. First featured in the Cadillac CT6, the tech is also available on 2021 Cadillac CT4, CT5, and Escalade Models. And it will be featured in the Cadillac Lyriq, the all-electric SUV coming out in 2023.

If you already own a 2021 model year F-150 or Mustang Mach-E, the BlueCruise will be available for download later this year. That said, Ford recently took five F-150s and five Mustang Mach-Es on what they call “the mother of all road trips.” Spanning across Canada, BlueCruise was tested for over 500,000 miles in inclement weather and harsh road conditions. In other words, neither option is unsafe, but one has been tried and tested by consumers a bit longer.

GM sued Ford over the BlueCruise name

BlueCruise Hands Free Driving Display
BlueCruise Display | Ford

Speaking of being in the game longer, GM sued Ford over the name BlueCruise, arguing it infringes on their brand. Ford countered with the point that the word “cruise” is generally understood to be cruise control. And other automakers feature cruise-related names, such as the Hyundai Smart Cruise Control. According to RoadShow, GM wants to block Ford from using the name, but whether that effort falls flat or not is yet to be determined.

Semantics aside, both Chevy SuperCruise and Ford BlueCruise are similar technologies, tracking the driver and the road simultaneously. And each is a step in the right direction towards a fully autonomous future. But we’re not there yet.

RELATED: Don’t Expect Hands-Free Driving in These Ford F-150 Lightning Models

The post Chevy SuperCruise vs. Ford BlueCruise: Which Cruise to Choose appeared first on MotorBiscuit.

by Gabrielle DeSantis

The Ford F-150 Lightning and electric Chevy Silverado are making waves in the work truck segment. But this isn’t the first time Ford or Chevy has dipped into the market. Way back in 1996, GM debuted their production electric vehicle, the EV1. With increased awareness for EVs, the other two American automakers swapped the engines in their light trucks, the Ford Ranger and Chevy S-10, for electric powertrains. But which of the two was better? And where are they now?

Electric Chevy S-10 | GM

Chevy pioneered the electric work truck effort with the Chevy S-10

The electric Chevy S-10 was never destined for a large-scale market, as only 492 were made from 1997 to 1998. Instead, the light work truck was geared towards the utility companies and even the Air Force to be used as electric fleet vehicles. Though, because of the new technology, they didn’t manage a very cheap price point. The truck was sold for $33,000 when new, and for that amount of money, you weren’t getting excellent performace.

For context, the lead-acid battery packs used in these early electric cars were incredibly heavy. The pack alone weight 1,400 lbs, and when put in the modified chassis, the truck ended up being 4,200 lbs. In comparison, a gas-powered S-10 from the same year was only 3,000 lbs. And while that extra weight certainly doesn’t help the performance figures, lead-acid batteries weren’t ideal in the first place.

The electric managed 114 horsepower, lower than that of the gasoline models. It could get up to a 70 mph top speed, but it took 13.5 seconds to accelerate to 50 mph. And the range Chevy claimed the car had was around 60 miles. But after testing, the EPA found that, at a constant 60 mph speed, the truck only had 39 miles of juice. Not to mention it took five hours and 15 minutes to charge.

The lead-acid batteries were swapped with lighter and more efficient nickel-metal batteries in 1998. The range jumped to 88 miles, and the 0-50 sprint now took 10 seconds. Regardless of model year and powertrain, however, the electric S-10 could carry 950 lbs of stuff in the six-foot bed. And while it pales in comparison to today’s EVs, for the first-ever electric work truck, the S-10 performed well.

Ford outlasted Chevy with the Ranger EV

Ford Ranger Electric Vehicle
Electric Ford Ranger | Ford

Then along came Ford in 1998, ready to one-up Chevy be electrifying one of their most popular trucks: the Ford Ranger. While the S-10 was produced from 1997 to 1998, the Ranger’s production run lasted from 1998 to 2002. And because of the long production run, Ford built 1,400 of them in comparison to Chevy’s sub-500. So the Ranger was more abundant and lasted longer, but was it any better?

Let’s start with the price. While the $33,000 price tag on the S-10 sounds like a lot for a truck that can’t go 100 miles, the Ranger makes it look like a bargain. Priced at $52,000 back in the 90s, the Ford Ranger electric pickup was more expensive than the base model Ford F-150 Lightning available today. And that lofty price tag is supplemented by lackluster performance.

With just 90 horsepower, the Ranger EV could get 60 miles per charge with the lead-acid batteries (and 80 miles once the nickel-metal hydride batteries were introduced). It, like the S-10, could accelerate to 60 in 10 seconds, but couldn’t go much faster. The one area the Ranger excelled in was the maximum payload. With the nickel-metal hydride batteries, it was capable of hauling 1,250 lbs of cargo. But neither truck would see long-term success, regardless of their strengths and weaknesses. And they both met an unfortunate fate.

What happened to the electric vehicles of the late 90s

California Residents Protest Crushing EV1s
California Residents Protest Crushing EV1s | Mel Melcon/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

The EV1, Ford Ranger, and Chevy S-10 all met the same fate. While the paid-off vehicles could remain in the customer’s possession, every leased vehicle was to be recalled and scrapped. That makes these late 90s electric cars exceedingly rare, with an assumed 200 Rangers left on public roads, and even fewer S-10s and EV1s.

There are legitimate reasons these vehicles were recalled, the main point being that they were dangerous to maintain. GM, Chevy, and Ford didn’t know how many mechanics would be able to work on the cars, and doing work at home would’ve put the customer at risk, which could lead to expensive lawsuits. Still, it’s unfortunate that they were erased so abruptly, as sticking with it could’ve given us vehicles like the Chevy Volt even sooner. But we’re moving forward, bringing electric work trucks back to the world stage, while reminiscing on the past.

RELATED: Every Upcoming Electric Truck You Need to know About

The post Chevy S-10 vs. Ford Ranger: The Original Electric Trucks appeared first on MotorBiscuit.

by Gabrielle DeSantis

We’ve been telling you for a year that the Camaro was on its deathbed, and we were wrong. There will be a new one. But finding that it will be a four-door and all-electric makes us wish it was dead. Sorry, Chevy.

The current Camaro won’t be replaced

MotorBiscuit Camaro 4-door | MB

Automotive News got a peek at GM’s production cycle for current products. It spells out that the current plan will run out the sixth-gen Camaro as is. Chevy had had it in production since 2015 as a 2016 model. 

Replacing it will be an “electric performance sedan” in 2023. What we don’t know is if this EV sedan will run concurrently with the sixth-gen Camaro or completely replace it. Either way, there is a four-door Camaro EV on the horizon. 

Though most automakers are on the truck and SUV bandwagon, electric sedans are far from dead. Tesla’s Model S and the Mercedes EQS are but two examples of electric sedans with a performance slant. And you only need to look at Toyota Camry sales to see that sedans still sell well. 

Does a Camaro as a performance sedan make sense?

four-door Camaro
MotorBiscuit Camaro 4-door | MB

So maybe an all-electric performance sedan makes some sense. SRT versions of the Chrysler 300 and Dodge Charger prove that point. No one ever believed that a Dodge Charger could be a four-door sedan, but Chrysler did it anyway. 

The same can be said for the Mustang Mach-E. After enthusiasts took to the internet with howls of protest, the Mach-E quietly sold out of its first year’s production. So done right, a sexy Camaro is a sexy Camaro; with two- or four-doors. 

GM has an entire range of EV platforms based around its Ultium system. Published ranges for power peak a 1,000 hp as with the upcoming GMC Hummer. So power and torque from an electric Camaro should not tarnish its heritage. 

Could Camaro be a performance division all its own?

MotorBiscuit Camaro 4-door front
MotorBiscuit Camaro 4-door | MB

There have also been discussions for years about slowly folding the Cadillac brand into a new Corvette brand. Cadillac just can’t seem to get any traction. This is somewhat due to the reputation it got from the 1970s and 1980s. It has never been able to live that down.

But the Corvette name is golden. So rather than try to soldier on with the Cadillac brand the idea was to make the Corvette GM’s new performance and luxury division. But there is no reason why the Camaro name couldn’t be tagged onto an entire line of performance. 

So, could this be GM’s first step in fulfilling that idea? Would you be interested in an entire range of performance sedans and crossovers under the Camaro umbrella? Crazier things have happened. 

RELATED: 2022 Anniversary Camaro Not Happening: Is 2021 The Last Year?

The post There Will Be a New Camaro-But It’s a 4-Door EV: No! appeared first on MotorBiscuit.