by Gabrielle DeSantis

You can get a turbo (or two) on nearly any BMW these days. Twenty years ago, the exact opposite was true, at least in the United States. For decades the Bavarian firm relied heavily on naturally aspirated engines for production road cars, and created some bonafide masterpieces in the process, like the E46 M3’s 333 hp S54 inline-six. Long before the M-series and its all-motor marvels, however, BMW was struggling just to survive the post-WWII era in one piece. Models like the 507 roadster, once owned by Elvis Pressley, were stunning to look at and drove well, but out of reach for normal people.

Leader of the New Class

1974 BMW 2002 Turbo | Richard Bord via Getty Images

What saved BMW during those hard times was a smaller economical car line that appealed to the masses. Enter the New Class, or Neue Klasse in German. Under the hood was the M10 four-cylinder engine, a fairly simple and very robust design. It would go on to power millions of BMWs, most of which were naturally aspirated. Standard M10 motors were competent and agreeable, like author Robert Louis Stevenson’s character, Dr. Jekyll. When engineers added a turbocharger to create the BMW 2002 Turbo, they unleashed its alter-ego, the gnarly Mr. Hyde.

Flares, stripes and some good old-fashioned turbo lag

1973 BMW 2002 Turbo | Didier Messens via Getty Images

The 1974 BMW 2002 Turbo used the same basic rotating assembly and Kugelfischer mechanical fuel injection as the 2002 tii, which produced around 130 to 140 hp, depending on who you ask. According to Road and Track reporting at the time, engineers dropped the compression ratio on the M10 motor and added an oil cooler for the new turbo application. The resulting upgrade to 170 hp and 181 lb-ft of torque was impressive on paper. But more significantly, the turbocharger transformed the seat-of-the-pants experience and power delivery.

Instead of the typical linear progression as revs increase on a naturally aspirated motor, acceleration was sluggish at low speeds until the turbo kicked in violently around 4000 rpm. From there to the rev cut of 6500 rpm, the BMW 2002 Turbo lept forward with the characteristic turbo “whoosh” and the authority of a much larger engine. After a thrilling span of only 2500 rpm, it was time to change gears and start again in the non-boosted zone. This was a new experience for most of the automotive world, and would come to be called “turbo lag.”

From family cars to Formula 1

Gerhard Berger drives a BMW M12 turbo Formula 1 car in the 1986 Belgian Grand Prix
Gerhard Berger drives a BMW M12 turbo Formula 1 car in the 1986 Belgian Grand Prix | Mike King via Getty Images

Like its powerband, the life of the BMW 2002 Turbo was short-lived. The factory production was limited to just 1672 cars, largely due to the 1970s oil crisis. However, further development of the turbo M10 engine would eventually yield the lower displacement M12 racing version, which BMW used to compete in Formula 1 throughout the 1970s and 1980s. According to BMW Blog, output was in excess of 1,000 hp and could be as much as 1,300 horsepower in qualifying trim.

Though the BMW 2002 Turbo was made for only one year, its strong M10 engine and later M12 derivative highlighted the vast potential of a well-engineered turbo four-cylinder, setting the stage for its popularity in road cars and various forms of racing to this day.

RELATED: Small and Sinister: The BMW 2002 Turbo Hommage Concept

The post The BMW 2002 Turbo Was the Original Boosted Bavarian appeared first on MotorBiscuit.

by Gabrielle DeSantis

Why has Tesla only stopped production due to the microchip shortage for three days in total? Some automakers have had to shut down lines for weeks at a time. Even top-selling vehicles like Ford’s F-150 and Chevy’s Silverado have had to halt production for lack of chips. But now Tesla has revealed why it keeps cranking out cars.

What is Tesla’s secret to continuous production?

Tesla Headquarters Beijing, China | VCG via Getty Images

In an earnings update for the second quarter this year, Tesla hypes its “unparalleled ability to react quickly and mitigate disruptions to manufacturing.” That is something probably every manufacturer could boast, even the ones with shut-down assembly lines. But there has to be more to Tesla’s continuous production.

There is. Teslarati says that in Tesla’s 2021 first-quarter earnings update it developed new firmware for chips so it didn’t use semiconductors. Instead, it shifted to microcontrollers. That is how it has been able to avoid production stoppages beyond those three days it stopped the Fremont plant. 

“Our team has demonstrated an unparalleled ability to react quickly and mitigate disruptions to manufacturing caused by semiconductor shortages,” the Q2 statement says. “And our electrical and firmware engineering teams remain hard at work designing, developing, and validating 19 new variants of controllers in response to ongoing semiconductor shortages.”

Tesla kept production unbroken and increased production as well

The 2021 Tesla Cybertruck at a construction site like a work truck
2021 Tesla Cybertruck | Tesla

This allowed not only Tesla to keep its line running but it has actually increased production for the first half of 2021. The shortage of microchips is so bad that the Biden Administration is floating an idea to catch manufacturers up. It wants to invest $52 billion into semiconductor research and manufacturing. That’s how much of a crisis the microchip shortage has created. 

“While we saw ongoing semiconductor supply challenges in Q2, we were able to further grow our production,” the statement says. In fact, Tesla’s Q2 net income hit over $1 billion. That is more than the company made in all of 2020. The only way that could happen was to be cranking out cars in record numbers. 

Tesla sold 201,304 vehicles in Q2 alone. Interestingly, virtually all of those were either Model 3 sedans or Model Y crossovers. Also interesting is that Tesla made over $100 million from investing in Bitcoin in Q1 but lost $23 million from it in Q2. 

It took rewriting the software and using alternative chips

Elon Musk is building a tunnel for Tesla vehicles?
Tesla CEO Elon Musk | Frederic J. Brown /AFP via Getty Images

So rewriting the software and using alternative chips is how Tesla CEO Elon Musk described its ability to stay above water. He did warn that moving forward the modules controlling airbags and seatbelts are getting low. This could affect production for the last half of 2021. 

We wonder if other manufacturers will follow Tesla’s lead and switch over to microcontrollers? In its simplest form, it means going from at least two interconnected transistors to a single integrated circuit or chip. It is more expensive but factored over hundreds of thousands of vehicles, it can’t add much to manufacturing costs. Especially when you consider how much it costs to shut an assembly line down for two weeks. 

RELATED: Tesla VINs and Orders Disappearing: What’s Going On?

The post The Sneaky Way Tesla Makes Cars Without Microchips appeared first on MotorBiscuit.

by Gabrielle DeSantis

Ford filed for the “Skyline” trademark with the US Patent and Trademark Office on July 12. For decades that name was synonymous with Nissan’s AWD turbocharged Godzilla. While this action only hints at best toward possible future cars, now only Ford can use the name for a car, SUV, or truck. But this could spark a comeback. In the late 1950s, Ford gave the name “Skyliner” to four of its passenger vehicles. 

Ford Crestline Skyliner

1954 Ford Crestline Skyliner | Vintage Car Fan

For 1954 only, Ford gave its Crestline, a top-shelf vehicle, the Skyliner treatment. It was a coupe with a glass top and had a 3.9-liter overhead valve V8, sending 130 horsepower to the rear wheels. It could also come with a 3.6-liter straight-six, making 115 horsepower. Either could mate to a manual or automatic transmission. It outsold the Mercury Monterey Sun Valley at 13,144 units, according to Hemmings

Another of Crestline’s big attractions was its overhead valve V8. It succeeded the flathead, which had valves built into the cylinder heads. This new design was bigger but provided a better flow and produced more power. 

Ford Fairlane Crown Victoria Skyliner

1955-ford-fairlane-crown-victoria-skyliner
1955 Ford Fairlane Crown Victoria Skyliner | Vintage Car Fan

Between the Crestline and Fairlane, Ford released the first-ever Crown Victoria, from 1955-1956. Poor sales figures ensured its limited run. The car came with a 162 horsepower 272 V8, and a glass top similar to the Crestline. Like the Crestline, it uses coil spring independent front suspension, a live rear axle, and hydraulic drum brakes.

Ford Fairlane Skyliner

1957-ford-fairlane-skyliner-at-docks
1957 Ford Fairlane | National Motor Museum/Heritage Images/Getty Images

The Fairlane started life as a full-size car in 1955 but became mid-size when 1962 rolled around, and it fits right between the petite Falcon and Mammoth Galaxie. Ford built the Fairlane Skyliner from 1957-1959, and although it had a 352 V8 pumping out 300 horsepower, the main attraction to the Fairlane Skyliner was its retractable hardtop

Exclusive to vehicles from Ford and not Lincoln or Mercury, the Fairlane Skyliner had a hardtop that could retract into where the trunk would normally be. What’s more, is it was fully automated. All the driver had to do was press a button, and the hardtop would retract itself into the trunk space and lock itself down. 

Ford Galaxie Skyliner

1959-ford-galaxie-skyliner
1959 Ford Galaxie Skyliner | Getty Images

The Galaxie Skyliner joined Ford’s lineup midway through 1959, replacing the Fairlane as a much heavier and more expensive car. Aside from badges, the Galaxie and Fairline of this vintage are identical. Ford ceased production of the Skyliner name in 1959, making it one of the rarest and most sought-after Fords.

Why Ford adopted the Skyline name yet again is unknown. However, resurrecting the name on a new hardtop convertible coupe would be well-received. Whether Ford does something with the name or not, Nissan may not be able to sell a Skyline in the US anytime soon. According to Ford Authority, Ford may need to negotiate with Nissan over some intellectual property rights, but that’s still to come.

RELATED: 10 Forgotten Fords That You May Not Have Heard Of

The post Looking Back at Ford’s Skyliner Vehicles appeared first on MotorBiscuit.

by Gabrielle DeSantis

Formula 1 team Red Bull Racing may spend up to $1.8 million on repairs for Max Verstappen’s car after his harrowing clash with Lewis Hamilton. The two made contact coming into Copse corner at Silverstone, during the British Grand Prix on Sunday, July 18.

Verstappen and Hamilton’s Crash At Silverstone

Verstappen and Hamilton were neck and neck through a series of corners. When Verstappen went around the outside of Hamilton into Copse, the Mercedes tagged the Red Bull’s rear left wheel. That spun Verstappen across the gravel into the tire barrier at 180 mph. Verstappen climbed out of the car, into the hospital, and therefore out of the race. Hamilton received a 10-second penalty, which he served in the pit lane, and went on to win the race.

Verstappen hit the wall under 51Gs of force. As a result, the right half of his RB16 car was completely destroyed from the carbon fiber to the suspension. Christian Horner, team principal at Red Bull Racing, estimates Red Bull Racing may spend around $1.8 million. However, Red Bull Racing could potentially save the Honda engine.

Red Bull Racing’s Cost Cap Concerns

Verstappen At British Grand Prix | Red Bull Racing

$1.8 million was barely a fix-it ticket for a team like Red Bull in previous seasons. However, 2021 introduced a $145 million cost cap for the season, excluding marketing or salaries. This elevates that $1.8 million figure as a more significant number. Rescuing the Honda engine could save Red Bull approximately $18 million, according to F1 Chief Technical Director Pat Symonds, in an interview he gave with Motorsport Magazine

Red Bull Racing’s Cost Breakdown

Max Verstappen climbing out of wrecked car at Silverstone 2021.
Verstappen Climbing Out Of Crashed RB16 | Formula 1

From pictures, the damage to Verstappen’s car was contained to the exterior carbon fiber, suspension, and wings. Symonds stipulates the carbon fiber monocoque chassis costs $707,000, while the front and rear wings, combined with the DRS, could cost $291,500. 

Red Bull will almost certainly need to replace or repair the car’s hydraulic system, judging by the pictures from the aftermath. According to Symonds, hydraulics control nine subsystems of the car, including brake-by-wire, the gearbox, turbo wastegate, and the clutch, and others. Replacing the system could cost $170,000.

Should Red Bull Racing Pay?

The Red Bull Racing pit wall at Silverstone.
Red Bull Racing Pit Wall | Red Bull Racing

A controversy surrounding this incident is if whether or not the FIA should count the repair costs towards Red Bull Racing’s budget, since the Stewards deemed the crash Hamilton’s fault. Regardless, Red Bull wants harsher punishment for Hamilton but needs more evidence first in order to mount an appeal.

The $1.8 million figure is just an estimate. However, a real number gives a better idea of what impact this crash had on Red Bull Racing’s budget and championship. Given the complexities of this generation’s power unit, the engine is the most expensive part of the car. However, if Red Bull Racing can save $18 million from having to replace the engine, its championship fight continues without threat to the budget.

RELATED: Formula 1 Imola Crash: A Measly $1.3 Million Crash

The post Red Bull Racing May Spend $1.8 Million In Repairs To Verstappen’s Car appeared first on MotorBiscuit.