by Gabrielle DeSantis

Tesla is no stranger to being in the news, nor is the company a stranger to recalls of its vehicles. Now, the company’s latest recall in China has made waves in the media. However, is this recall really that big of a deal, or is it just another case of an exaggeration to generate clicks? After all, it wouldn’t be the first time that has happened.

News outlets made a mountain out of a molehill

Tesla showroom | VCG/VCG via Getty Images

Many news outlets declared the recall was both huge and yet could not agree on exactly how many vehicles were actually affected. CNN declared that “Tesla hits another bump in the road” and mentioned that the seemingly large scale of the problem is a “black eye”  for Tesla. Furthermore, many news outlets only briefly noted that it was not technically a recall and buried that tidbit under words like “Autopilot issues” and “debacles in China.”

The ‘huge’ Tesla recall is voluntary

According to CleanTechnica, who broke down the recall details, which is not really a recall, it centers around a potential problem where the driver could accidentally activate the active cruise control. Therefore, Tesla is actually just being proactive. It is not a required recall issued by a regulating body, and there have been no cases of this actually happening. Additionally, it is a straightforward fix, just a simple software update that can be done without going into the dealership. 

The software update involves approximately 249,855 Model 3 and Model Y vehicles built at the Shanghai facility and approximately 35,665 imported Model 3s. Tesla is planning to contact any customers whose vehicle needs the update. 

Twitter chimed in with thoughts on the Tesla recall

CleanTechnica followed up its original article, illustrating some of the Twitter responses that included a few interesting comparisons and an incredibly brief video demonstrating how to complete the software update for the recall. The video, which lasts just 12 seconds, shows that to get the update, you push the right lever down once, and you will hear a “ding” that indicates the vehicle is in TACC mode. Then you lift the same lever, and you will hear another “ding,” which turns TACC mode off, and you are done. Easy peasy.

Another comment compared it to updates on various apps on your phone. The user stated “62 recalls available” and included a screenshot of various apps, including American Airlines and Audible audiobooks and podcasts. The article pointed out how ludicrous it would be if news outlets reported the brand had a “recall” every time the app needed to be updated. Another user also commented on a new term coined by CNBC, dubbing it a “soft recall,” and the user speculated that “I guess going to a dealership is called a ‘hard recall.'”

It really should not surprise anyone that news outlets exaggerated the issue, most likely to get more clicks. Many people believe that there is no such thing as bad press, and for both Tesla and the different news outlets, that probably holds. Elon Musk, CEO and face of Tesla, seems to thrive on being at the center of news reports, good and bad. Meanwhile, most media sites thrive on clicks and mentions. This is what this article, and the other articles cited, did.  

RELATED: 2022 Tesla Model S Plaid Records Unreal 0-60 MPH Time

The post The ‘Huge’ Tesla Recall Is Really Just a Minor Software Update appeared first on MotorBiscuit.

by Gabrielle DeSantis

Holy moly, the 2021 Ford Ranger just pulled off a significant victory. It turns out that the Ford Ranger is more popular than the 2021 Jeep Gladiator. The Ranger feels like an underdog in this situation but deserves its victory. 

The 2021 Ford Ranger vs. the 2021 Jeep Gladiator 

2021 Ford Ranger | Ford

The battle between which truck is best will continue for decades, but at the moment, the 2021 Ford Ranger is more popular than the 2021 Jeep Gladiator. According to CarProUSA, the Ford Ranger is outselling the Jeep Gladiator this year. 

In the first quarter of 2021, the Ranger sold 24,166 units, and the Gladiator sold 18,822 units. During the second quarter, the Ranger sold 20,988 units, and the Gladiator sold 15,258 models. However, the semiconductor shortage and Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak may have limited production. Either way, let’s see how the Ranger and Gladiator compare. 

How do the Gladiator and Ranger perform? 

Under the hood of the 2021 Ford Ranger, you’ll find a 2.3-liter turbo-four engine with 270 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque. When properly equipped, the Ranger can tow up to 7,500 lbs and carry a payload of up to 1,860 lbs. 

The 2021 Jeep Gladiator has a 3.6-liter V6 engine with 285 hp and 260 lb-ft of torque. You can also upgrade to the 3.0-liter V6 diesel engine for 260 hp and 442 lb-ft of torque. The Gladiator can tow up to 7,650 lbs and carry a payload of up to 1,700 lbs.

You can equip the Ranger with the new Tremor Off-Road package to enhance its off-roading capabilities. It won’t get you as far as the Gladiator Rubicon but adds more features for a reasonable price. 

The Jeep Gladiator can accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in 8.5 seconds, which is a little slow for a midsize truck. It has a smoother ride than the Wrangler, and its off-roading setup contributes to road and wind noise in the cab. But the seats are supported, and the powerful climate control system keeps everyone comfortable. 

The Ranger can accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in 6.8 seconds, which is pretty quick. It’s a little slow to downshift, and the suspension is unsettled over bumps. Plus, according to Edmunds, sudden braking may cause a nosedive. Wind and road noise are nicely controlled, and the seats are well padded, but the climate control system is a little frustrating to use. 

Does the Ranger or Gladiator have better features? 

A red 2021 Jeep Gladiator parked on a hill, the Gladiator is one of the best American trucks
2021 Jeep Gladiator | Stellantis

Both the 2021 Jeep Gladiator and 2021 Ford Ranger struggle with cargo space. But the Gladiator has a larger backseat that easily folds out of the way. The one-piece bench in the Ranger makes storing items with passengers in the back a little tricky. 

The interior of the Gladiator is described as spacious, durable, and comfortable. The Ranger’s interior is described as a little dull with the use of cheap plastic materials. The base model of the Ranger comes with an AM/FM audio system, but you can upgrade to the 8.0-inch touchscreen. 

With the Gladiator, you get a standard touchscreen and can upgrade to the 7.0 and 8.4-inch sizes. Both trucks come with standard Apple CarPlay and Android Auto if you upgrade to larger screens. 

The Ford Ranger starts at about $24,820, while the Jeep Gladiator begins at around $34,040. But the Gladiator provides standard 4×4. The lower price may influence buyers. While the Ranger serves as a more practical option, the Gladiator is built for adventuring. Both trucks can work and play hard, so we recommend test-driving both.

RELATED: 3 Big Reasons the Ford Ranger Is Better Than the Toyota Tacoma

The post The 2021 Ford Ranger Is Crushing the Jeep Gladiator appeared first on MotorBiscuit.

by Gabrielle DeSantis

If you don’t love cleaning, you might be interested in tips to avoid some chores. One way to bypass a bit of vacuuming and still keep up with home maintenance is to use a robot vacuum cleaner. These little machines do a decent job. And among the most popular is the iRobot Roomba. This robot vacuum brand makes four popular models that have earned excellent Consumer Reports reviews and cost less than $600.

iRobot Roomba is among the best-known robot vacuum brands

iRobot Roomba robot vacuum cleaner | Katherine Frey/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Consumer Reports has found that robot vacuum cleaners have improved greatly in the past few years. CR even had to change its tests to make them more difficult. “We’re challenging these bots to work larger, more complex spaces — making sure they don’t snag on your carpet tassels and cables and don’t get stuck in awkward places,” says Susan Booth, who oversees the vacuum testing for Consumer Reports. 

In addition to looking at predicted reliability and owner satisfaction, the new tests evaluate how well the robot vacuums clean different types of flooring surfaces and how well they navigate tight corners. Consumer Reports also examines the data privacy and security for robot vacuums that are connected to the internet.

Though these machines still aren’t as good as upright vacuums, they can be a big help for keeping a home clean. CR’s rankings of robotic vacuums list seven iRobot Roomba models in the top 10. There’s a reason that robot vacuums from this company are popular: They’re great products. But they can also be expensive. So here’s a look at four models that cost less than $600.

iRobot Roomba i3+

The iRobot Roomba i3+ earned an overall score of 72 out of 100 from Consumer Reports. It has an average carpet score of 3 out of 5. This score measures how well the vacuum cleans a medium-pile carpet. It has a bare-floors score of 5 out of 5. This score looks at how well the vacuum cleans laminate flooring. The iRobot Roomba i3+ also earns a perfect 5 for its navigation abilities. It receives a slightly lower 4 out of 5 for predicted reliability.

This vacuum has one side brush and a self-emptying docking station. It also has Wi-Fi/cellular connectivity. It’s great at cleaning along edges and picking up pet hair. It’s also very quiet. However, it has a relatively small dirt bin, and it sometimes scatters debris, Consumer Reports warns. This vacuum also earned Consumer Reports’ “Recommended” label. It’s priced between $549 and $599.99.

iRobot Roomba i3

The iRobot Roomba i3 also earned an overall score of 72. This model has the same scores as the i3+. Consumer Reports didn’t test this model but expects it to function the same as the i3+. It works the same way but doesn’t have the self-emptying docking station. CR also recommends this model, it costs only $349 to $399.99.

iRobot Roomba 960

The iRobot Roomba 960 has an overall score of 71 from Consumer Reports. It matches the i3 and i3+ with a perfect 5 in both bare floors and navigation. But it performs even better on carpeting, receiving a 4. It also earned a 4 in predicted reliability.

The 960 has one side brush and Wi-Fi/Cellular connectivity. It adapts easily to various floor surfaces, says Consumer Reports, but it is slightly taller than some models and might not fit under all furniture. Again, this vacuum snagged Consumer Reports’s “Recommended” distinction. It retails for $484 to $499.99.

iRobot Roomba e5

Last, the iRobot Roomba e5 has an overall score of 70. It earned a 5 in bare floors and 4 in carpet, navigation, and predicted reliability.

It has one side brush plus Wi-Fi/cellular connectivity. A big perk is that this model is super-quiet. However, it also has a small dirt bin, Consumer Reports says. Overall, though, the Roomba e5 is a deal, priced between $297 and $349.99. CR even labels it a “Best Buy.”

So, for less than $600, you can keep up with floor cleaning without running the vacuum yourself. iRobot offers several excellent Roomba models.

RELATED: 8 Best Vacuum Cleaners of 2021 According to Consumer Reports

The post 4 Best Roomba Robot Vacuums Under $600 According to Consumer Reports appeared first on MotorBiscuit.

by Gabrielle DeSantis

Tesla is once again at the forefront of electric car technology. Tesla’s new patent incorporates new techniques that no one has seen before (or even really imagined). Tesla’s new patent involves using table salt to mine lithium for use in its batteries. Although lithium is already in use, this new technology is supposed to make it easier and cheaper to get the lithium necessary for Tesla’s batteries.

2021 Tesla Model 3 | Tesla

What is Tesla’s new patent all about?

Tesla has filed a patent detailing a new way to mine for the lithium necessary for batteries. The concept isn’t new; Tesla CEO Elon Musk first mentioned it at last year’s battery day. The details weren’t very clear then; all we knew was that it involved table salt. 

At the time, Musk said, “We found that we can actually use table salt, sodium chloride, to basically extract the lithium from the ore. Nobody has done this before to the best of my knowledge.”

What does Tesla’s new patent say?

According to Electrek, which has gotten hold of Tesla’s new patent, there’s now more information. The patent is long and very detailed, but Electrek summed up the most important parts. Here’s an excerpt from the patent::

Lithium is a strategic metal for the lithium ion battery (LIB) and electric vehicle (EV) industry. Therefore, a means for economically extracting lithium from various lithium sources is important in order to reduce the cost of batteries and electric cars. The dominant lithium sources commonly used for mining are lithium brines due to the low cost associated with Li extraction from these brine sources. However, the ever-increasing demand for LIBs makes it necessary to explore other lithium sources.

Another method for Li extraction is to extract the Li from clay minerals. In this process, the lithium is obtained by acid leaching, where clay minerals are mixed with an aqueous solution of common mineral acids, such as H2SO4 or HCl, and then heated under atmospheric pressure to leach out the lithium contained in the clay minerals. This acid leach method not only leaches out lithium, but it also leaches out high concentrations of impurities including Na, K, Fe, Al, Ca, and Mg. High lithium loss from the subsequent removal of the impurity elements, especially Al removal, may significantly lower the overall lithium extraction efficiency. Furthermore, high acid consumption and complicated leach solution purification methods also make the overall extraction process less cost-effective and not environmentally friendly.

What does this mean for Tesla?

The Senior Vice President of engineering at Tesla claims that this new mining process would save Tesla 33%. Hopefully this cost savings would be passed on to customers. Increasing access to electric cars is only good for the environment. 

Tesla has already purchased 10,000 acres of land in Nevada where it plans to mine lithium. 

If Tesla has found a way to improve lithium extraction while cutting costs, that could be huge for electric vehicles. Obviously, it will initially benefit Tesla, but it will likely expand to improve battery production for other car manufacturers as well. 

RELATED: Tesla Autopilot Driver Snoozes While Car Hurtles at 80 MPH

The post Tesla’s Table Salt Patent Could Be a Game Changer appeared first on MotorBiscuit.